Increasing vaccine uptake among pregnant women is a critical part of combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
1
The prevalence and correlates of vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Nigeria are unknown. We assessed acceptability and correlates of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Nigeria.The study was conducted at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital in Nigeria, a 750-bed referral facility serving ∼13 million people. Systematic sampling was used to recruit consenting pregnant women upon arrival for antenatal care (n = 420). Quantitative data were collected using an adapted, interviewer-administered, structured questionnaire.
2
,3
A variable representing vaccine acceptability was created based on a 5-point Likert scale (very keen = 1 to against it = 5). Vaccine acceptability was defined as “yes” if a respondent answered “very keen” or “pretty positive” and “no” for any other response. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess factors independently associated with vaccine acceptability. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and omnibus tests were used to determine model fitness.Among the 420 pregnant women invited to participate, 399 (95.0%) completed the survey-based interview. The median gestational age of respondents was 32 weeks (interquartile range: 24–36). Among respondents, 359 (90.0%) were of Hausa-Fulani ethnicity, 373 (93.5%) were Muslim, 280 (70.2%) had two or more children, and 356 (89.2%) had completed at least secondary education. Most (312 [78.2%]) had received at least one dose of tetanus toxoid during the current pregnancy.
Overall, 283 respondents (70.9%) thought that pregnant women affected by COVID-19 could become very sick. Similarly, 296 respondents (74.2%) were worried about the effects of COVID-19 on their unborn babies. However, only 74 respondents (18.6%) considered themselves to be at high risk for COVID-19 infection. In terms of protection, 236 respondents (59.1%) thought that COVID-19 vaccination could reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19, and 222 (55.6%) believed that the vaccine would reduce risk for the unborn baby.
Most respondents were worried about vaccine side effects, efficacy, and safety. For example, 339 (85.0%) and 360 (90.2%) were worried about safety and side effects, respectively. Additionally, 149 (37.3%) were concerned about infertility-related rumors. Half of the respondents (200 [50.1%]) reported that they would consider vaccination if recommended by their doctor. However, only 135 respondents (33.8%) would accept the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. One-quarter (106 [26.6%]) reported that they would only take it after delivery, and 93 (23.3%) would delay vaccination until after weaning the baby off breast milk.
The respondent’s religion, number of living children, education, income, gestational age at booking, self-assessed health status, risk perception, and vaccine safety concerns were independently associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability (Table, Appendix). For example, non-Muslim respondents had a four-fold increased likelihood of accepting the vaccine during pregnancy. Similarly, respondents with primary education were 6 times more likely to accept the vaccine. Furthermore, primigravid women and those who booked early (≤12 weeks gestational age) for antenatal care had 3-fold increased odds of accepting COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Women who received tetanus toxoid in the current pregnancy and those who self-assessed their health status as “good” or “very good” had at least a 4-fold increased likelihood of accepting the COVID-19 vaccine. Finally, pregnant women who were not concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety were 8 times more likely to accept the vaccine.
In conclusion, we found low COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women seeking antenatal care in Nigeria. Vaccine acceptability was associated with several sociodemographic and health-related factors. Our findings present an opportunity for public health action to reduce misconceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine. Our results will inform the design of interventions to build trust and boost COVID-19 vaccine confidence among pregnant women in similar settings.
Supplementary Data
Supplemental TableLogistic regression model for predictors of acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women attending AKTH, Kano, Nigeria (n = 399)
AKTH: Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; OR: odds ratio.
| Characteristics | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Religion | ||
| Islam | Referent | |
| Christianity | 4.08 (1.53–10.91) | 0.007 |
| Education | ||
| Less than primary | Referent | |
| Completed primary | 6.21 (1.08–35.69) | 0.011 |
| Completed secondary or more | 1.46 (0.33–6.39) | 0.69 |
| Monthly income (Naira) | ||
| <30 000 | Referent | |
| ≥30 000 | 1.76 (1.14–3.26) | 0.034 |
| Number of living children | ||
| 0 | 2.88 (1.13–7.34) | 0.018 |
| 1 | 1.19 (0.58–2.42) | 0.74 |
| 2–4 | 1.24 (0.54–2.84) | 0.97 |
| ≥5 | Referent | |
| Gestational age at booking, wk | ||
| ≤12 | 3.00 (1.71–5.27) | 0.002 |
| 23–28 | Referent | |
| Current gestational age, wk | ||
| 13–28 | 1.46 (0.82–2.63) | 0.20 |
| 29–40 | Referent | |
| Tetanus toxoid immunization in current pregnancy | ||
| Yes | 6.90 (2.70–17.63) | <0.001 |
| No | Referent | |
| Self-assessed health status | ||
| Very good | 5.15 (1.65–16.07) | <0.001 |
| Good | 4.04 (2.34–7.01) | 0.007 |
| Fair | Referent | |
| COVID-19 risk perception | ||
| High | 1.24 (1.07–2.74) | 0.037 |
| Low | Referent | |
| Concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety | ||
| Yes | Referent | |
| No | 8.30 (4.41–15.62) | 0.007 |
| Concerned about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy | ||
| Yes | Referent | |
| No | 1.41 (0.41–4.87) | 0.59 |
| Concerned about side effects of COVID-19 vaccine | ||
| Yes | Referent | |
| No | 1.70 (0.43–6.77) | 0.45 |
Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.63; P = 0.73. Models adjusted for age.
a Significant at P < 0.05
References
- COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation: current research and gaps in understanding.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11: 735394
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II.Psychol Med. 2021; : 1-15
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics.Lancet Public Health. 2021; 6: e210-e221
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 16, 2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
