Advertisement
JOGC
Gynaecologic Oncology • Oncologie gynécologique| Volume 43, ISSUE 10, P1136-1144.e1, October 2021

Download started.

Ok

Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling as an Alternative to Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Endometrial Cancer and Obesity

      ABSTRACT

      Objective

      Although its use in endometrial cancer staging is relatively new, sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling has been shown to be highly accurate and is associated with few complications. However, some studies report lower rates of detection with SLN sampling among patients with obesity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility of SLN sampling in endometrial cancer for patients with obesity, and to determine whether omitting lymph node dissection (LND) in surgical staging using SLN sampling impacts oncologic outcomes.

      Methods

      we conducted a retrospective study of patients with obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 2007 and 2017, that compared surgical and oncologic outcomes of 2 cohorts: patients who underwent LND and patients who underwent SLN without lymphadenectomy. The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative bleeding; lymph node assessment information; intraoperative and postoperative adverse events; and oncologic outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). PFS was defined as the time from surgery to the recurrence or death from any cause. OS was defined as time from diagnosis to death or the last date the patient was known to be alive, and DSS was defined as the time from the surgery to death from the disease.

      Results

      Out of 223 patients with a median BMI of 40.6 kg/m2, 140 underwent LND and 83 underwent SLN alone. The median operative time for patients in the SLN group was shorter than that of patients in the LND group (190.5 [range 108–393] vs. 238 [131–440] min; P < 0.001), and the SLN group had lower median estimated blood loss than the LND group (30 [range 0–300] vs. 40 [range 0–800] mL; P = 0.03). At the 24-month follow-up cut-off, 98% of patients were alive and 95.5% were disease free, with no significant differences in OS, DSS, and PFS between the 2 groups (P = 0.7, P = 0.8, and P = 0.4, respectively).

      Conclusions

      In patients with obesity, omitting LND from surgical staging with SLN sampling was associated with shorter operative times and less bleeding and did not affect survival at 2 years.

      RÉSUMÉ

      Objectif

      Bien que l'utilisation du prélèvement du ganglion sentinelle (GS) soit relativement récente dans la stadification du cancer de l'endomètre, il s'avère que cette méthode donne des résultats très précis et est associée à peu de complications. Toutefois, certaines études font état d'un faible taux de détection avec le prélèvement du GS chez les patientes atteintes d'obésité. La présente étude vise à évaluer la faisabilité du prélèvement du GS chez les patientes atteintes d'obésité ayant un cancer de l'endomètre et à déterminer si l'omission du curage ganglionnaire dans la stadification chirurgicale par prélèvement du GS a une incidence sur les issues oncologiques.

      Méthodologie

      Nous avons mené une étude rétrospective auprès de patientes atteintes d'obésité (IMC ≥ 35 kg/m2) ayant reçu un diagnostic de carcinome de l'endomètre entre 2007 et 2017 en comparant les issues chirurgicales et oncologiques de 2 cohortes : les patientes ayant subi un curage ganglionnaire et les patientes ayant subi un prélèvement du GS sans curage ganglionnaire. Le critère de jugement principal était le temps opératoire. Les critères de jugement secondaires comprenaient les saignements peropératoires, l'information de l'analyse des ganglions lymphatiques, les événements indésirables peropératoires et postopératoires et les issues oncologiques, notamment la survie sans progression (SSP), la survie globale (SG) et la survie spécifique (SS). La SSP a été définie comme le délai entre l'intervention chirurgicale et la récidive ou le décès, toutes causes confondues. La SG a été définie comme le délai entre le diagnostic et le décès ou la dernière date où l'on savait que la patiente était encore vivante, et la SS a été définie comme le délai entre l'intervention chirurgicale et le décès des suites de la maladie.

      Résultats

      Parmi les 223 patientes, dont l'IMC médian était de 40,6 kg/m2, 140 ont subi un curage ganglionnaire et 83 ont subi un prélèvement du GS seul. Le temps opératoire médian pour les patientes du groupe de prélèvement du GS était plus court que celui du groupe de curage ganglionnaire (190,5 [108-393] vs 238 [131-440] min; p < 0,001), et le groupe de prélèvement du GS présentait une perte sanguine estimée médiane inférieure à celle du groupe de curage ganglionnaire (30 [0-300] vs 40 [0-800] ml; p = 0,03). Au seuil de suivi de 24 mois, 98 % des patientes étaient vivantes et 95,5 % n’étaient pas atteintes de la maladie, sans différence significative quant à la SG, à la SS et à la SSP entre les deux groupes (p = 0,7, p = 0,8 et p = 0,4, respectivement).

      Conclusions

      Chez les patientes atteintes d'obésité, l'omission du curage ganglionnaire dans la stadification chirurgicale par prélèvement du GS était associée à un temps opératoire plus court et à des saignements moins importants, et n'avait pas d'incidence sur la survie à 2 ans.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Twells LK
        • Gregory DM
        • Reddigan J
        • et al.
        Current and predicted prevalence of obesity in Canada: a trend analysis.
        CMAJ Open. 2014; 2: E18-E26
      1. http://obesitycanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2-Epidemiology-of-Adult-Obesity-5-with-links.pdf accessed in April 17th

        • Weir CB
        • Jan A
        BMI classification percentile and cut off points.
        2021 (accessed in April 17th)
        • Reeves KW
        • Carter GC
        • Rodabough RJ
        • et al.
        Obesity in relation to endometrial cancer risk and disease characteristics in the Women's Health Initiative.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121: 376-382
        • Koh WJ
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        • Bean S
        • et al.
        . Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16: 170-199
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        • Iasonos A
        • Zhou Q
        • et al.
        Is there a therapeutic impact to regional lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198 (457 e1–5; discussion e5–6)
        • Press JZ
        • Gotlieb WH
        Controversies in the treatment of early stage endometrial carcinoma.
        Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012; 2012578490
        • Almeida Jr., OD
        Robotic hysterectomy strategies in the morbidly obese patient.
        JSLS. 2013; 17: 418-422
        • Gunderson CC
        • Java J
        • Moore KN
        • et al.
        The impact of obesity on surgical staging, complications, and survival with uterine cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 ancillary data study.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 133: 23-27
        • Morton DL
        • Wen DR
        • Wong JH
        • et al.
        Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.
        Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 392-399
        • Cody 3rd., HS
        Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer.
        Breast Cancer. 1999; 6: 13-22
        • Holloway RW
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        • Backes FJ
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146: 405-415
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        Sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: a modern approach to surgical staging.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014; 12: 288-297
        • How J
        • Lau S
        • Press J
        • et al.
        Accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection following intra-operative cervical injection for endometrial cancer: a prospective study.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127: 332-337
        • Multinu F
        • Ducie JA
        • Eriksson AGZ
        • et al.
        Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer with nonbulky lymph node metastasis: comparison of comprehensive surgical staging and sentinel lymph node algorithm.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 155: 177-185
        • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
        Uterine neoplasms (version 1.2019).
        2018 (Available at) (April 17th)
        • Tanner EJ
        • Sinno AK
        • Stone RL
        • et al.
        Factors associated with successful bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 138: 542-547
        • Eriksson AG
        • Montovano M
        • Beavis A
        • et al.
        Impact of obesity on sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer undergoing robotic surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 2522-2528
        • Lau S
        • Vaknin Z
        • Ramana-Kumar AV
        • et al.
        Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 717-724
        • Matanes E
        • Abitbol J
        • Kessous R
        • et al.
        Oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41: 450-458
        • Gotlieb WH
        The assessment and surgical management of early-stage vulvar cancer.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 17: 557-569
        • Barlin JN
        • Khoury-Collado F
        • Kim CH
        • et al.
        The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 125: 531-535
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        • Alektiar K
        • Iasonos A
        • et al.
        The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103: 714-718
        • Mariani A
        • Dowdy SC
        • Cliby WA
        • et al.
        Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 109: 11-18
        • Piovano E
        • Fuso L
        • Poma CB
        • et al.
        Complications after the treatment of endometrial cancer: a prospective study using the French-Italian glossary.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24: 418-426
        • Anderson B
        • Connor JP
        • Andrews JI
        • et al.
        Obesity and prognosis in endometrial cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174 (discussion 8–9): 1171-1178
        • Munstedt K
        • Wagner M
        • Kullmer U
        • et al.
        Influence of body mass index on prognosis in gynecological malignancies.
        Cancer Causes Control. 2008; 19: 909-916
        • Mauland KK
        • Trovik J
        • Wik E
        • et al.
        High BMI is significantly associated with positive progesterone receptor status and clinico-pathological markers for non-aggressive disease in endometrial cancer.
        Br J Cancer. 2011; 104: 921-926
        • Jeong NH
        • Lee JM
        • Lee JK
        • et al.
        Role of body mass index as a risk and prognostic factor of endometrioid uterine cancer in Korean women.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 118: 24-28
        • Billingsley CC
        • Cansino C
        • O'Malley DM
        • et al.
        Survival outcomes of obese patients in type II endometrial cancer: defining the prognostic impact of increasing BMI.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 140: 405-408
        • von Gruenigen VE
        • Tian C
        • Frasure H
        • et al.
        Treatment effects, disease recurrence, and survival in obese women with early endometrial carcinoma : a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
        Cancer. 2006; 107: 2786-2791
        • Chia VM
        • Newcomb PA
        • Trentham-Dietz A
        • et al.
        Obesity, diabetes, and other factors in relation to survival after endometrial cancer diagnosis.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17: 441-446
        • Felix AS
        • Scott McMeekin D
        • Mutch D
        • et al.
        Associations between etiologic factors and mortality after endometrial cancer diagnosis: the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139: 70-76
        • Wissing M
        • Mitric C
        • Amajoud Z
        • et al.
        Risk factors for lymph nodes involvement in obese women with endometrial carcinomas.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 155: 27-33
        • Pavelka JC
        • Ben-Shachar I
        • Fowler JM
        • et al.
        Morbid obesity and endometrial cancer: surgical, clinical, and pathologic outcomes in surgically managed patients.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 95: 588-592
        • Jewell EL
        • Huang JJ
        • Abu-Rustum NR
        • et al.
        Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 133: 274-277