ABSTRACT
Objective
The purpose of this quality improvement study was to determine the effect of adding
azithromycin to standard antibiotic prophylaxis on the rates surgical site infection
(SSI) in women undergoing both elective and non-elective cesarean deliveries at our
centre.
Methods
A before-and-after quality improvement study was conducted at the Regina General Hospital
in Regina, Saskatchewan. Data collected from 989 women who had a caesarean delivery
between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 were compared with those from 1033 women who
had a caesarean delivery between August 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018, after the introduction
of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the change
in the incidence of SSI up to 30 days following surgery. Secondary outcome measures
included timing of azithromycin prophylaxis and the number of women who did not receive
azithromycin.
Results
Surgical site infection rates decreased from 3.5% to 2.9% after adjunctive azithromycin
prophylaxis was introduced. The absolute reduction in SSIs of 0.6% was not statistically
significant (P = 0.42). There were no differences in SSI rates between the elective and non-elective
subgroups.
Conclusion
Adding azithromycin to the standard antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery showed
no statistically significant reduction in SSI rates in a population with low baseline
rates of SSI.
RÉSUMÉ
Objectif
L'objectif de cette étude d'amélioration de la qualité était de déterminer l'effet
de l'ajout d'azithromycine au protocole standard d'antibioprophylaxie sur le taux
d'infection du champ opératoire (ICO) chez les femmes subissant une césarienne planifiée
ou non planifiée dans notre centre de soins.
Méthodologie
Une étude sur l'amélioration de la qualité pré- et post-intervention a été menée à
l'Hôpital général de Regina, en Saskatchewan. Les données recueillies de 989 femmes
ayant subi une césarienne entre le 1er juin 2016 et le 30 juin 2017 ont été comparées à celles de 1 033 femmes ayant subi
une césarienne entre le 1er août 2017 et le 31 juillet 2018, après l'instauration de la prophylaxie adjuvante
par azithromycine. Le critère de jugement principal était la variation de l'incidence
des ICO jusqu’à 30 jours après la césarienne. Les critères de jugement secondaires
comprenaient le moment d'administration de la prophylaxie par azithromycine et le
nombre de femmes qui n'ont pas reçu d'azithromycine.
Résultats
Les taux d'ICO sont passés de 3,5 à 2,9 % après l'instauration de la prophylaxie adjuvante
par azithromycine. La réduction absolue de 0,6 % du taux d'ICO n’était pas statistiquement
significative (P = 0,42). Aucune différence n'a été observée quant au taux d'ICO entre les sous-groupes
de césarienne planifiée et de césarienne non planifiée.
Conclusion
L'ajout d'azithromycine au protocole standard d'antibioprophylaxie pour la césarienne
n'a révélé aucune diminution statistiquement significative du taux d'ISO chez une
population dont le taux initial d'ICO était faible.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
REFERENCES
- Textbook of caesarean section.1st ed. Oxford University Press, London, UK, 2016
- Examining cesarean section rates in Canada using the modified Robson classification.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020; 42: 757-765
- No. 247-antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric procedures.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 39: e293-e299
- Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after Cesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : 9-15
- Procedure-associated surgical site infection (SSI).2016
- Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: retrospective, difference-in-differences estimation of the effect on surgical-site-infection.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32: 804-808
- Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at Caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : 6-16
- Adding azithromycin to cephalosporin for Cesarean delivery infection prophylaxis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 1279-1284
- ACOG practice bulletin number 199: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labour and delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: e103-e119
- Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for Cesarean delivery.N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1231-1241
- Economic evaluation of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for Cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 130: 328-334
- Tri-Council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans (TCPS 2).Ottawa, 2018
- A comparison of 3 antibiotic regimens for prevention of postcesarean endometritis: an historical cohort study.Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214 (751.e1–4)
- Risk factors for surgical site infection following Cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.CMAJ Open. 2017; 5: e546-e556
- Risk factors for postcesarean maternal infection in a trial of extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 481-485
- Decreasing incidence of postcesarean endometritis with extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis.Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 51-56
- Infections complicating Cesarean delivery.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018; 31: 368-376
WHO guidelines for safe surgery. World Health Organization; 2009. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44185/9789241598552_eng.pdf;jsessionid=BDEA7848765BF373B24B1AE7B56CF4FF?sequence=1.
- The surgical care improvement project and prevention of post-operative infection, including surgical site infection.Surg Infect. 2011; 12: 163-168
- Randomized clinical trial of extended spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with coverage for Ureaplasma urealyticum to reduce post-cesarean delivery endometritis.Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 1183-1189
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 04, 2021
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors declare they have nothing to disclose.
All authors have indicated they meet the journal's requirements for authorship.
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.