Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
- Non-invasive prenatal testing and the unveiling of an impaired translation process.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 39: 10-17
- No. 348-Joint SOGC-CCMG guideline: update on prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 39: 805-817
- The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19: 22
- Keeping the backdoor to eugenics ajar?: disability and the future of prenatal screening.AMA J Ethics. 2016; 18: 406-415
- Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing: current and emerging ethical, legal, and social issues.Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015; 16: 369-398
Winnipeg Child & Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G (D.F.), 3 SCR 925.
Dobson (Litigation Guardian of) v. Dobson, 2 SCR 753, 1999 CanLII 698 (SCC).
The Constitution Act, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11.
Lai KKR. Abortion bans: 9 states have passed bills to limit the procedure this year. Available at:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/abortion-laws-states.html. Accessed on June 11, 2019.
- Physician liability and non-invasive prenatal testing.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36: 907-914
- Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynecologists in tertiary hospitals.PLoS One. 2013; 8
- Invasive prenatal diagnostic testing recommendations are influenced by maternal age, statistical misconception and perceived liability.Journal of genetic counseling. 2018; 27: 59-68
- Contrasting medical and legal standards of evidence: a precision medicine case study.J Law Med Ethics. 2016; 44: 194-204
Nosheen H, Culbert A. As fewer patients sue their doctor, the rate of winning malpractice suits is dropping too. Available at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/medical-malpractice-doctors-lawsuits-canada-1.4913960. Accessed on September 30, 2019.
- Genomic malpractice: an emerging tide or gentle ripple?.Food Drug Law J. 2018; 73: 1
McInerney v. MacDonald, 2 SCR 138.
Reibl v. Hughes, 2 SCR 880, 1980 CanLII 23 (SCC).
Arndt v. Smith, 2 SCR 539, 1997 CanLII 360 (SCC).
- Canadian pregnant women's preferences regarding NIPT for down syndrome: the information they want, how they want to get it, and with whom they want to discuss it.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41: 782-791
- Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19: 27
- Benefits, challenges and ethical principles associated with implementing noninvasive prenatal testing: a Delphi study.CMAJ Open. 2018; 6: E513-E519
- Pandora's pregnancy: NIPT, CMA and genome sequencing–a new era for prenatal genetic testing.Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39: 859-865
- Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit.BMC Med. 2019; 17: 105
- Spinning the genome: why science hype matters.Perspect Biol Med. 2018; 61: 560-571
- Media portrayal of non-invasive prenatal testing: a missing ethical dimension.J Science Comm. 2016; 15: A03
Disclosures: This study was funded by the Genome Canada project PEGASUS 2 (PErsonalized Genomics for prenatal Abnormalities Screening USing maternal blood: Towards First Tier Screening and Beyond; RES0038244). Specific funders that supported this research include Genome Canada and Genome Alberta.
Both authors have indicated that they meet the journal's requirements for authorship.