Advertisement
JOGC

Opinion de comité No 387 - La bandelette sous-urétrale dans le traitement de l'incontinence urinaire à l'effort

Published:March 28, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.01.015
      Le comité d'urogynécologie de la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada (SOGC) a préparé la présente opinion de comité, les membres du comité médico-juridique et d’éthique et du comité de surveillance et de gestion des directives cliniques de la SOGC l'ont passée en revue avant que le conseil d'administration de la SOGC ne l'approuve.

      Mots clés 

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      RÉFÉRENCES

        • Herschorn S
        • Gajewski J
        • Schulz J
        • et al.
        A population-based study of urinary symptoms and incontinence: the Canadian Urinary Bladder Survey.
        BJU Int. 2008; 101: 52-58
        • Abrams P
        • Smith AP
        • Cotterill N
        The impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a real-world population of women aged 45-60 years: results from a survey in France, Germany, the UK and the USA.
        BJU Int. 2015; 115: 143-152
        • Labrie J
        • Berghmans BL
        • Fischer K
        • et al.
        Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1124-1133
        • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
        Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of vaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse.
        Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD2011
        • Health Canada
        Surgical Mesh - Complications Associated with Transvaginal Implantation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse - Notice to Hospitals.
        Ottawa: Health Canada;. 2014; (Disponible à:) (Consulté le 12 juillet 2018)
        • Scottish Government
        Scottish Independent Review of the Use, Safety and Efficacy of Transvaginal Mesh Implants in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
        Scottish Government, Edinburgh, Scotland2017 (Disponible à:) (. Consulté le 19 décembre 2018)
        • American Urogynecologic Society
        Position Statement: Mesh Midurethral Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
        American Urogynecologic Society, Silver Spring, MD2014 (updated 2018. Disponible à:) (Consulté le 19 décembre 2018)
        • International Urogynecologic Association
        Position Statement on Mid-Urethral Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
        International Urogynecologic Association, Burnsville, MN2014 (Disponible à:) (Consulté le 19 décembre 2018)
        • Welk B
        • Carlson KV
        • Baverstock RJ
        • et al.
        Canadian Urological Association position statement on the use of transvaginal mesh.
        Can Urol Assoc J. 2017; 11: S105-S1S7
        • Ulmsten U
        • Henriksson L
        • Johnson P
        • et al.
        An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996; 7 (discussion 5–6): 81-85
        • Jonsson Funk M
        • Levin PJ
        • Wu JM
        Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 845-851
        • Ford AA
        • Rogerson L
        • Cody JD
        • et al.
        Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;; CD006375
        • Holdo B
        • Verelst M
        • Svenningsen R
        • et al.
        Long-term clinical outcomes with the retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure compared to Burch colposuspension for correcting stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
        Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28: 1739-1746
        • Nilsson CG
        • Palva K
        • Aarnio R
        • et al.
        Seventeen years' follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24: 1265-1269
        • Fusco F
        • Abdel-Fattah M
        • Chapple CR
        • et al.
        Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
        Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 567-591
        • Jonsson Funk M
        • Siddiqui NY
        • Pate V
        • et al.
        Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208 (73e1–7)
        • Welk B
        • Al-Hothi H
        • Winick-Ng J
        Removal or revision of vaginal mesh used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
        JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 1167-1175
        • Gurol-Urganci I
        • Geary RS
        • Mamza JB
        • et al.
        Long-term rate of mesh sling removal following midurethral mesh sling insertion among women with stress urinary incontinence.
        JAMA. 2018 23; 320: 1659-1669

      Linked Article

      • Committee Opinion No. 387-Mid-Urethral Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence
        Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada Vol. 41Issue 9
        • Preview
          Stress urinary incontinence affects approximately 25% of Canadian women1 and is associated with a significant negative impact on quality of life.2 First-line non-surgical treatments such as pelvic floor muscle re-training and incontinence devices (such as pessaries) have proven effective and are viable options for a large proportion of patients; however, many women choose to proceed with elective surgery as a more effective treatment.3
        • Full-Text
        • PDF