Advertisement
JOGC

No. 372-Statement on Planned Homebirth

      This Committee Opinion has been prepared by Clinical Practice Obstetrics and reviewed by the Guideline Management and Oversight Committee and approved by the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

      Abbreviations:

      CI (confidence interval), RR (relative risk), SOGC (Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Society of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists of Canada
        Policy statement on midwifery.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009; 31: 662-663
        • Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario
        Data Analysis for Annual Report 2014-2016.
        Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario, Ottawa2016 (Available at:)
        • Perinatal Services BC
        Midwifery Report: Deliveries in BC 2015/16.
        Perinatal Services BC, Vancouver2017 (Available at:)
        • Murray-Davis B
        • McDonald H
        • Rietsma A
        • et al.
        Deciding on home or hospital birth: results of the Ontario Choice of Birthplace Survey.
        Midwifery. 2014; 30: 869-876
      1. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
        Members dialogue. 2001;
      2. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia.
        Professional standards and guidelines: planned homebirths. Vancouver. 2009–2017;
      3. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. Personal correspondence December 12, 2018. Kelly Newton, CPSB Practice Standards Coordinator.

        • Dowswell T
        • Thornton JG
        • Hewison J
        • et al.
        Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 753-757
        • Hendrix M
        • Van Horck M
        • Moreta D
        • et al.
        Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands.
        BJOG. 2009; 116 (discussion 542–4): 537-542
        • Zielinski R
        • Ackerson K
        • Kane Low L
        Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.
        Int J Womens Health. 2015; 7: 361-377
        • Vedam S
        • Rossiter C
        • Homer CSE
        • et al.
        The ResQu Index: a new instrument to appraise the quality of research on birth place.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12e0182991
        • Catling-Paull C
        • Coddington RL
        • Foureur MJ
        • et al.
        Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.
        Med J Aust. 2013; 198: 616-620
        • Cox KJ
        • Schlegel R
        • Payne P
        • et al.
        Outcomes of planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives in southeastern Pennsylvania, 1983-2008.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013; 58: 145-149
        • Davis D
        • Baddock S
        • Pairman S
        • et al.
        Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women?.
        Birth. 2011; 38: 111-119
        • de Jonge A
        • Geerts CC
        • van der Goes BY
        • et al.
        Perinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743 070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databases.
        BJOG. 2015; 122: 720-728
        • de Jonge A
        • Mesman JA
        • Mannien J
        • et al.
        Severe adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in The Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.
        BMJ. 2013; 346: f3263
        • Grunebaum A
        • McCullough LB
        • Sapra KJ
        • et al.
        Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209 (e1–6): 323
        • Hutton EK
        • Reitsma AH
        • Kaufman K
        Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study.
        Birth. 2009; 36: 180-189
        • Janssen PA
        • Lee SK
        • Ryan EM
        • et al.
        Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.
        CMAJ. 2002; 166: 315-323
        • Janssen PA
        • Saxell L
        • Page LA
        • et al.
        Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
        CMAJ. 2009; 181: 377-383
        • Johnson KC
        • Daviss BA
        Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.
        BMJ. 2005; 330: 1416
        • Kennare RM
        • Keirse MJ
        • Tucker GR
        • et al.
        Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes.
        Med J Aust. 2010; 192: 76-80
        • Lindgren HE
        • Radestad IJ
        • Christensson K
        • et al.
        Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 751-759
        • Nove A
        • Berrington A
        • Matthews Z
        Comparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UK.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12: 130
        • Brocklehurst P
        • Hardy P
        • et al.
        • Birthplace in England Collaborative Group
        Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d7400
        • Hiraizumi Y
        • Suzuki S
        Perinatal outcomes of low-risk planned home and hospital births under midwife-led care in Japan.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013; 39: 1500-1504
        • Homer CS
        • Thornton C
        • Scarf VL
        • et al.
        Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 206
        • Hutton EK
        • Cappelletti A
        • Reitsma AH
        • et al.
        Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.
        CMAJ. 2016; 188: E80-E90
        • Rossi AC
        • Prefumo F
        Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 222: 102-108
        • Janssen PA
        • Lee SK
        • Ryan ER
        • et al.
        An evaluation of process and protocols for planned home birth attended by regulated midwives in British Columbia.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003; 48: 138-145
        • Association of Ontario Midwives
        Choice of Birthplace: Guideline for Discussing Choice of Birthplace With Clients: Methodology and Review of Evidence.
        Association of Ontario Midwives, Toronto2017 (Available at:)
        • Blix E
        • Huitfeldt AS
        • Oian P
        Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: a retrospective cohort study.
        Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012; 3: 147-153
        • de Jonge A
        • van der Goes BY
        • Ravelli AC
        • et al.
        Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 1177-1184
        • Kataoka Y
        • Eto H
        • Iida M
        Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
        Midwifery. 2013; 29: 965-972
        • van der Kooy J
        • Poeran J
        • de Graaf JP
        • et al.
        Planned home compared with planned hospital births in The Netherlands: intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnancies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 1037-1046
        • Cheng YW
        • Snowden JM
        • King TL
        • et al.
        Selected perinatal outcomes associated with planned home births in the United States.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209 (e1–8): 325
        • Snowden JM
        • Tilden EL
        • Snyder J
        • et al.
        Planned out-of-hospital birth and birth outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 2642-2653
        • Grunebaum A
        • McCullough LB
        • Sapra KJ
        • et al.
        Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211 (e1–7): 390
        • Wax JR
        • Lucas FL
        • Lamont M
        • et al.
        Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203 (e1–8): 243
        • Hutton EK
        The safety of home birth.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016; 38: 331-333
        • Hutton E
        • Farmer M
        • Carson G
        The roles of multidisciplianary team members in the care of the pregnant woman.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016; 38: 1068-1069