Advertisement
JOGC

No. 260-Ultrasound in Twin Pregnancies

      Abstract

      Objective

      To review the literature with respect to the use of diagnostic ultrasound in the management of twin pregnancies. To make recommendations for the best use of ultrasound in twin pregnancies.

      Outcomes

      Reduction in perinatal mortality and morbidity and short- and long-term neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. Optimization of ultrasound use in twin pregnancies.

      Evidence

      Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library in 2008 and 2009 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., twin, ultrasound, cervix, prematurity) and key words (e.g., acardiac, twin, reversed arterial perfusion, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, amniotic fluid). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date restrictions. Studies were restricted to those with available English or French abstracts or text. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated into the guideline to September 2009. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies .

      Values

      The evidence collected was reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, with input from members of the Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee and the Genetics Committee of the SOGC. The recommendations were made according to the guidelines developed by The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

      Benefits, harms, and costs

      The benefit expected from this guideline is facilitation and optimization of the use of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.

      Summary Statements

      • 1.
        There are insufficient data to make recommendations on repeat anatomical assessments in twin pregnancies. Therefore, a complete anatomical survey at each scan may not be needed following a complete and normal assessment (III).
      • 2.
        There are insufficient data to recommend a routine preterm labour surveillance protocol in terms of frequency, timing, and optimal cervical length thresholds (II-2).
      • 3.
        Singleton growth curves currently provide the best predictors of adverse outcome in twins and may be used for evaluating growth abnormalities (III)
      • 4.
        It is suggested that growth discordance be defined using either a difference (20 mm) in absolute measurement in abdominal circumference or a difference of 20% in ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (II-2).
      • 5.
        Although there is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific schedule for ultrasound assessment of twin gestation, most experts recommend serial ultrasound assessment every 2 to 3 weeks, starting at 16 weeks of gestation for monochorionic pregnancies and every 3 to 4 weeks, starting from the anatomy scan (18 to 22 weeks) for dichorionic pregnancies (II-1).
      • 6.
        Umbilical artery Doppler may be useful in the surveillance of twin gestations when there are complications involving the placental circulation or fetal hemodynamic physiology (II-2).
      • 7.
        Although many methods of evaluating the level of amniotic fluid in twins (deepest vertical pocket, single pocket, amniotic fluid index) have been described, there is not enough evidence to suggest that one method is more predictive than the others of adverse pregnancy outcome (II-3).
      • 8.
        Referral to an appropriate high-risk pregnancy centre is indicated when complications unique to twins are suspected on ultrasound. (II-2). These complications include:
        • 1.
          Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
        • 2.
          Monoamniotic twins gestation
        • 3.
          Conjoined twins
        • 4.
          Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence
        • 5.
          Single fetal death in the second or third trimester
        • 6.
          Growth discordance in monochorionic twins.

      Recommendations

      • 1.
        All patients who are suspected to have a twin pregnancy on first trimester physical examination or who are at risk (e.g., pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technologies) should have first trimester ultrasound performed (II-2A).
      • 2.
        Every attempt should be made to determine and report amnionicity and chorionicity when a twin pregnancy is identified (II-2A).
      • 3.
        Although the accuracy in confirmation of gestational age at the first and second trimester is comparable, dating should be done with first trimester ultrasound (II-2A).
      • 4.
        Beyond the first trimester, it is suggested that a combination of parameters rather than a single parameter should be used to confirm gestational age (II-2C).
      • 5.
        When twin pregnancy is the result of in vitro fertilization, accurate determination of gestational age should be made from the date of embryo transfer (II-1A).
      • 6.
        There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation of which fetus (when discordant for size) to use to date a twin pregnancy. However, to avoid missing a situation of early intrauterine growth restriction in one twin, most experts agree that the clinician may consider dating pregnancy using the larger fetus (III-C).
      • 7.
        In twin pregnancies, aneuploidy screening using nuchal transluscency measurements should be offered (II-2B).
      • 8.
        Detailed ultrasound examination to screen for fetal anomalies should be offered, preferably between 18 and 22 weeks' gestation, in all twin pregnancies (II-2B).
      • 9.
        When ultrasound is used to screen for preterm birth in a twin gestation, endovaginal ultrasound measurement of the cervical length should be performed (II-2A).
      • 10.
        Increased fetal surveillance should be considered when there is either growth restriction diagnosed in one twin or significant growth discordance (II-2A).
      • 11.
        Umbilical artery Doppler should not be routinely offered in uncomplicated twin pregnancies (I-E).
      • 12.
        For defining oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios, the ultrasonographer should use the deepest vertical pocket in either sac: oligohydramnios when < 2 cm and polyhydramnios when >8 cm (II-2B).

      Abbreviations:

      AC (abdominal circumference), CL (cervical length), EFW (estimated fetal weight), IUGR (intrauterine growth restriction), NPV (negative predictive value), NT (nuchal translucency), PPV (positive predictive value), TTTS (twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome)

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Woolf S.H.
        • Battista R.N.
        • Angerson G.M.
        • et al.
        Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
        CMAJ. 2003; 169: 207-208
        • Chasen S.T.
        • Chervenak F.A.
        What is the relationship between the universal use of ultrasound, the rate of detection of twins, and outcome differences?.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 41: 66-77
        • Sherer D.M.
        Is less intensive fetal surveillance of dichorionic twin gestations justified?.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 167-173
        • Allen V.M.
        • Windrim R.
        • Barrett J.
        • et al.
        Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature.
        BJOG. 2001; 108: 931-936
        • DeFalco L.M.
        • Sciscione A.C.
        • Megerian G.
        • et al.
        Inpatient versus outpatient management of monoamniotic twins and outcomes.
        Am J Perinatol. 2006; 23: 205-211
        • Heyborne K.D.
        • Porreco R.P.
        • Garite T.J.
        • et al.
        Improved perinatal survival of monoamniotic twins with intensive inpatient monitoring.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 96-101
        • Monteagudo A.
        • Roman A.S.
        Ultrasound in multiple gestations: twins and other multifetal pregnancies.
        Clin Perinatol. 2005; 32 (vi): 329-354
        • Bromley B.
        • Benacerraf B.
        Using the number of yolk sacs to determine amnionicity in early first trimester monochorionic twins.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1995; 14: 415-419
        • Stenhouse E.
        • Hardwick C.
        • Maharaj S.
        • et al.
        Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: how accurate are we?.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19: 350-352
        • Wood S.L.
        • St. Onge R.
        • Connors G.
        • Elliot P.D.
        Evaluation of the twin peak or lambda sign in determining chorionicity in multiple pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 6-9
        • Winn H.N.
        • Gabrielli S.
        • Reece E.A.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonographic criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of placental chorionicity in twin gestations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 1540-1542
        • D'Alton M.E.
        • Dudley D.K.
        The ultrasonographic prediction of chorionicity in twin gestation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 557-561
        • Scardo J.A.
        • Ellings J.M.
        • Newman R.B.
        Prospective determination of chorionicity, amnionicity, and zygosity in twin gestations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 1376-1380
        • Sepulveda W.
        Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: double trouble.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 10: 79-81
        • Chervenak F.A.
        • Skupski D.W.
        • Romero R.
        • et al.
        How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 678-687
        • Kalish R.B.
        • Thaler H.T.
        • Chasen S.T.
        • et al.
        First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 975-978
        • Tunón K.
        • Eik-Nes S.H.
        • Grøttum P.
        • et al.
        Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 41-46
        • Wisser J.
        • Dirschedl P.
        • Krone S.
        Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 4: 457-462
        • Bennett K.A.
        • Crane J.M.
        • O'shea P.
        • et al.
        First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 1077-1081
        • Sebire N.J.
        • D'Ercole C.
        • Soares W.
        • et al.
        Intertwin disparity in fetal size in monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91: 82-85
        • Salomon L.J.
        • Cavicchioni O.
        • Bernard J.P.
        • et al.
        Growth discrepancy in twins in the first trimester of pregnancy.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26: 512-516
        • Gonce A.
        • Borrell A.
        • Fortuny A.
        • et al.
        First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy: does the addition of biochemistry make an improvement?.
        Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 1156-1161
        • Sebire N.J.
        • Snijders R.J.
        • Hughes K.
        • et al.
        Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 999-1003
        • Spencer K.
        • Nicolaides K.H.
        Screening for trisomy 21 in twins using first trimester ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years experience.
        BJOG. 2003; 110: 276-280
        • Vandecruys H.
        • Faiola S.
        • Auer M.
        • et al.
        Screening for trisomy 21 in monochorionic twins by measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25: 551-553
        • Summers A.M.
        • Langlois S.
        • Wyatt P.
        • et al.
        Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007; 29: 146-179
        • Sebire N.J.
        • D'Ercole C.
        • Hughes K.
        • et al.
        Increased nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 10: 86-89
        • Bush M.C.
        • Malone F.D.
        Down syndrome screening in twins.
        Clin Perinatol. 2005; 32 (vi): 373-386
        • Verdin S.M.
        • Economides D.L.
        The role of ultrasonographic markers for trisomy 21 in women with positive serum biochemistry.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 63-67
        • Lynch L.
        • Berkowitz G.S.
        • Chitkara U.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound detection of Down syndrome: is it really possible?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73: 267-270
        • Sperling L.
        • Tabor A.
        Twin pregnancy: the role of ultrasound in management.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 287-299
        • Hall J.G.
        Twins and twinning.
        Am J Med Genet. 1996; 61: 202-204
        • Edwards M.S.
        • Ellings J.M.
        • Newman R.B.
        • et al.
        Predictive value of antepartum ultrasound examination for anomalies in twin gestations.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 43-49
        • Brocks V.
        • Bang J.
        Routine examination by ultrasound for the detection of fetal malformations in a low risk population.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991; 6: 37-45
        • Goldenberg R.L.
        • Iams J.D.
        • Miodovnik M.
        • et al.
        The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 1047-1053
        • Skentou C.
        • Souka A.P.
        • To M.S.
        • et al.
        Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 17: 7-10
        • Vayssiere C.
        • Favre R.
        • Audibert F.
        • et al.
        Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pregnancies: a French prospective multicenter study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 1596-1604
        • Sperling L.
        • Kiil C.
        • Larsen L.U.
        • et al.
        How to identify twins at low risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26: 138-144
        • Guzman E.R.
        • Walters C.
        • O'Reilly-Green C.
        • et al.
        Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin gestations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1103-1107
        • Soriano D.
        • Weisz B.
        • Seidman D.S.
        • et al.
        The role of sonographic assessment of cervical length in the prediction of preterm birth in primigravidae with twin gestation conceived after infertility treatment.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 39-43
        • Yang J.H.
        • Kuhlman K.
        • Daly S.
        • et al.
        Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 288-291
        • Fujita M.M.
        • Brizot M.L.
        • Liao A.W.
        • et al.
        Reference range for cervical length in twin pregnancies.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 856-859
        • Bergelin I.
        • Valentin L.
        Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 21: 556-563
        • Gibson J.L.
        • Macara L.M.
        • Owen P.
        • et al.
        Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observational study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 561-566
        • Valentin L.
        • Bergelin I.
        Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 20: 256-262
        • Crane J.M.
        • Van den Hof M.
        • Armson B.A.
        • et al.
        Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90: 357-363
        • Fuchs I.
        • Tsoi E.
        • Henrich W.
        • et al.
        Sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin pregnancies in threatened preterm labor.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 42-45
        • Blickstein I.
        Is it normal for multiples to be smaller than singletons?.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18: 613-623
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Kogan M.
        • Martin J.
        • et al.
        What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States?.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 41: 114-125
        • Blickstein I.
        Normal and abnormal growth of multiples.
        Semin Neonatol. 2002; 7: 177-185
        • Blickstein I.
        Growth aberration in multiple pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005; 32 (viii): 39-54
      1. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 56, October 2004.

        • Hamilton E.F.
        • Platt R.W.
        • Morin L.
        • et al.
        How small is too small in a twin pregnancy?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 682-685
        • Alam Machado Rde C.
        • Brizot Mde L.
        • Liao A.W.
        • et al.
        Early neonatal morbidity and mortality in growth-discordant twins.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 167-171
        • Kato N.
        • Matsuda T.
        The relationship between birthweight discordance and perinatal mortality of one of the twins in a twin pair.
        Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006; 9: 292-297
        • Branum A.M.
        • Schoendorf K.C.
        The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 570-574
        • Hollier L.M.
        • McIntire D.D.
        • Leveno K.J.
        Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 1006-1010
        • Cheung V.Y.
        • Bocking A.D.
        • Dasilva O.P.
        Preterm discordant twins: what birth weight difference is significant?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 955-959
        • Fraser D.
        • Picard R.
        • Picard E.
        • et al.
        Birth weight discordance, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal outcomes in twins.
        J Reprod Med. 1994; 39: 504-508
        • Barrett J.
        • Bocking A.
        Management of twin pregnancies. SOGC consensus statement: Part 1. no. 91, July 2000.
        J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2000; 22: 519-529
        • Blickstein I.
        The definition, diagnosis, and management of growth- discordant twins: an international census survey.
        Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1991; 40: 345-351
        • Banks C.L.
        • Nelson S.M.
        • Owen P.
        First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 138: 34-38
        • Chang Y.L.
        • Chang T.C.
        • Chang S.D.
        • et al.
        Sonographic prediction of significant intertwin birth weight discordance.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 127: 35-40
        • Kingdom J.C.
        • Nevo O.
        • Murphy K.E.
        Discordant growth in twins.
        Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 759-765
        • MacLean M.
        • Mathers A.
        • Walker J.J.
        • et al.
        The ultrasonic assessment of discordant growth in twin pregnancies.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 2: 30-34
        • Chittacharoen A.
        • Leelapattana P.
        • Rangsiprakarn R.
        Prediction of discordant twins by real-time ultrasonography combined with umbilical artery velocimetry.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 118-121
        • Caravello J.W.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Morrison J.C.
        • et al.
        Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 529-533
        • Blickstein I.
        • Manor M.
        • Levi R.
        • et al.
        Is intertwin birth weight discordance predictable?.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996; 42: 105-108
        • Sayegh S.K.
        • Warsof S.L.
        Ultrasonic prediction of discordant growth in twin pregnancies.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993; 8: 241-246
        • Chamberlain P.
        • Murphy M.
        • Comerford F.R.
        How accurate is antenatal sonographic identification of discordant birthweight in twins?.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 40: 91-96
        • Snijder M.J.
        • Wladimiroff J.W.
        Fetal biometry and outcome in monochorionic vs. dichorionic twin pregnancies; a retrospective cross- sectional matched-control study.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998; 24: 197-201
        • Hill L.M.
        • Guzick D.
        • Chenevey P.
        • et al.
        The sonographic assessment of twin growth discordancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84: 501-504
        • Arbuckle T.E.
        • Wilkins R.
        • Sherman G.J.
        Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Canada.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 39-48
        • Giles W.
        • Bisits A.
        • O'Callaghan S.
        • et al.
        The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy.
        BJOG. 2003; 110: 593-597
        • Mongelli M.
        • Ek S.
        • Tambyrajia R.
        Screening for fetal growth restriction: a mathematical model of the effect of time interval and ultrasound error.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 908-912
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Parilla B.V.
        Positive predictive value of suspected growth aberration in twin gestations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 1139-1141
        • Gratacos E.
        • Lewi L.
        • Carreras E.
        • et al.
        Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 456-460
        • Wee L.Y.
        • Taylor M.J.
        • Vanderheyden T.
        • et al.
        Transmitted arterio-arterial anastomosis waveforms causing cyclically intermittent absent/reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow in monochorionic twins.
        Placenta. 2003; 24: 772-778
        • Magann E.F.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Martin Jr, J.N.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonic assessment of the amniotic fluid volume in diamniotic twins.
        J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1995; 2: 609-613
        • Magann E.F.
        • Martin Jr, J.N.
        Amniotic fluid volume assessment in singleton and twin pregnancies.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999; 26: 579-593
        • Devoe L.D.
        • Ware D.J.
        Antenatal assessment of twin gestation.
        Semin Perinatol. 1995; 19: 413-423
        • Watson W.J.
        • Harlass F.E.
        • Menard M.K.
        • et al.
        Sonographic assessment of amniotic fluid in normal twin pregnancy.
        Am J Perinatol. 1995; 12: 122-124
        • Chau A.C.
        • Kjos S.L.
        • Kovacs B.W.
        Ultrasonographic measurement of amniotic fluid volume in normal diamniotic twin pregnancies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 1003-1007
        • Quintero R.A.
        • Morales W.J.
        • Allen M.H.
        • et al.
        Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
        J Perinatol. 1999; 19: 550-555
        • Carr S.R.
        • Aronson M.P.
        • Coustan D.R.
        Survival rates of monoamniotic twins do not decrease after 30 weeks' gestation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 719-722
        • Tessen J.A.
        • Zlatnik F.J.
        Monoamniotic twins: a retrospective controlled study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77: 832-834
        • Rodis J.F.
        • McIlveen P.F.
        • Egan J.F.
        • et al.
        Monoamniotic twins: improved perinatal survival with accurate prenatal diagnosis and antenatal fetal surveillance.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1046-1049
        • Overton T.G.
        • Denbow M.L.
        • Duncan K.R.
        • et al.
        First-trimester cord entanglement in monoamniotic twins.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 13: 140-142
        • Tan T.Y.
        • Sepulveda W.
        Acardiac twin: a systematic review of minimally invasive treatment modalities.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22: 409-419
        • Moore T.R.
        • Gale S.
        • Benirschke K.
        Perinatal outcome of forty-nine pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 907-912
        • Sullivan A.E.
        • Varner M.W.
        • Ball R.H.
        • et al.
        The management of acardiac twins: a conservative approach.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 1310-1313
        • Lee H.
        • Wagner A.J.
        • Sy E.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196 (e1–4): 459
        • Livingston J.C.
        • Lim F.Y.
        • Polzin W.
        • et al.
        Intrafetal radiofrequency ablation for twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP): a single-center experience.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197 (e1–3): 399
        • Wong A.E.
        • Sepulveda W.
        Acardiac anomaly: current issues in prenatal assessment and treatment.
        Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 796-806
        • Metneki J.
        • Czeizel A.
        Conjoined twins in Hungary, 1970–1986.
        Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1989; 38: 285-299
        • Spitz L.
        • Kiely E.M.
        Conjoined twins.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 1307-1310
        • Newman R.B.
        • Luke B.
        Multifetal pregnancy: a handbook for the care of the pregnant patient.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2000: 149-172
        • Samuels P.
        Ultrasound in the management of the twin gestation.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 31: 110-122
        • Prompeler H.J.
        • Madjar H.
        • Klosa W.
        • et al.
        Twin pregnancies with single fetal death.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994; 73: 205-208
        • Landy H.J.
        • Weingold A.B.
        Management of a multiple gestation complicated by an antepartum fetal demise.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989; 44: 171-176