No. 356-Egg Freezing for Age-Related Fertility Decline

Published:December 06, 2017DOI:



      To provide a comprehensive review and evidence based recommendations for Canadian fertility centres that offer social egg freezing.


      In social egg freezing cycles we evaluated thawed oocyte survival rates, fertilization rates, embryo quality, pregnancy rates, and live birth rates. We also review how these outcomes are impacted by age, ovarian reserve, and the number of eggs cryopreserved. Finally, we discuss the risks of social egg freezing, the alternatives, the critical elements for counselling and informed consent, and future reporting of egg freezing outcome data.


      Published literature was reviewed through searches of MEDLINE and CINAHL using appropriate vocabulary and using key words (“oocyte cryopreservation,” “egg freezing,” “egg vitrification,” “social egg freezing,” and “elective egg freezing”). Results included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Expert opinion based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees was also included to discuss aspects of egg freezing not currently rigorously studied.


      The evidence obtained was reviewed and evaluated by the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) Committees of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) under the leadership of the principal authors.

      Benefits, Harms, and Costs

      Implementation of this guideline should assist the clinician to develop an optimal approach in providing counselling for egg freezing while minimizing harm and improving patient outcomes during treatment.


      These guidelines have been reviewed and approved by the membership of the CFAS and by the CPG Committees of CFAS and The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC).


      CFAS and SOGC.


      • 1.
        Patients should be advised that thawed oocyte survival rates vary, typically between 80% and 90% (Strong, High).
      • 2.
        Thawed oocytes should be fertilized using intra cytoplasmic sperm injection and patients should be advised that fertilization rates vary, typically between 70% and 80% (Strong, High).
      • 3.
        Patients should be advised that vitrified oocytes yield fewer blastocysts than fresh oocytes do (Weak, Moderate).
      • 4.
        Patients should be advised that there are very limited data on live birth rates after social egg freezing, but that the existing data suggest similar clinical pregnancy rates after transfer of embryos obtained by either vitrified or fresh oocytes (Strong, Moderate).
      • 5.
        Women considering social egg freezing should be advised that the age at which they freeze their eggs and the number of eggs that are frozen impact the probability that these eggs will enhance their fertility (Strong, Moderate).
      • 6.
        Ovarian reserve testing should be offered to help predict the number of retrievable eggs from a controlled ovarian stimulation cycle and to properly counsel those women at risk of very low oocyte yield (Strong, High).
      • 7.
        Women considering social egg freezing should be advised that more than one cycle may be required to obtain the number of mature eggs that is desired (Strong, High).
      • 8.
        Patients considering social egg freezing should be informed about the risks of controlled ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and pregnancy at a more advanced maternal age (Strong, Moderate).
      • 9.
        Patients considering social egg freezing should be advised that there is a chance they may not need to use their frozen eggs and that no guarantees can be made that their frozen eggs would produce a viable pregnancy (Strong, High).
      • 10.
        Women considering social egg freezing should be counselled about the alternative options (Strong, Moderate).
      • 11.
        Women undergoing social egg freezing should receive sufficient information to provide informed consent (Strong, High).
      • 12.
        In vitro fertilization centres offering social egg freezing should provide their patients with an estimate of their chances of success. This estimate should not only consider the published medical literature but also should take into account national data regarding social egg freezing and clinic-specific data regarding cumulative live birth rates per oocyte retrieval (Strong, Low).

      Key Words


      AFC (antral follicle count), AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), ART (assisted reproductive technology), ASRM (American Society for Reproductive Medicine), CARTR-BORN (Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register – Better Outcomes Registry & Network), CS (Caesarian section), FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), IVF (in vitro fertilization), LBR (Live Birth Rate), RCT (randomized controlled trial)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Milan A.
        Fertility: overview, 2009 to 2011.
        in: Division D. Statistics Canada. Statistics Canada, 2015 (Available at:) (Accessed on March 2, 2017)
        • Mill C.
        • Enders J.
        • Montanaro C.
        • et al.
        Delayed parenthood on the rise: a call for upstream preconception health promotion in Canada.
        Can J Public Health. 2016; 107: e333-e335
        • Hodes-Wertz B.
        • Druckenmiller S.
        • Smith M.
        • et al.
        What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility?.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 1343-1349
        • Hammarberg K.
        • Clarke V.E.
        Reasons for delaying childbearing—a survey of women aged over 35 years seeking assisted reproductive technology.
        Aust Fam Physician. 2005; 34 (206): 187-188
        • Mills M.
        • Rindfuss R.R.
        • McDonald P.
        • et al.
        Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 848-860
        • van Noord-Zaadstra B.M.
        • Looman C.W.
        • Alsbach H.
        • et al.
        Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy.
        BMJ. 1991; 302: 1361-1365
        • Menken J.
        • Trussell J.
        • Larsen U.
        Age and infertility.
        Science. 1986; 233: 1389-1394
        • Chen C.
        Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 884-886
        • van Uem J.F.
        • Siebzehnrubl E.R.
        • Schuh B.
        • et al.
        Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes.
        Lancet. 1987; 1: 752-753
        • Dondorp W.
        • de Wert G.
        • et al.
        • ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law
        Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1231-1237
        • Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
        Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 37-43
        • Stoop D.
        • van der Veen F.
        • Deneyer M.
        • et al.
        Oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion (AGE) is a preventive intervention, neither social nor nonmedical.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28: 548-551
        • Liu K.E.
        • Greenblatt E.M.
        Oocyte cryopreservation in Canada: a survey of Canadian ART clinics.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012; 34: 250-256
        • Petropanagos A.
        • Cattapan A.
        • Baylis F.
        • et al.
        Social egg freezing: risk, benefits and other considerations.
        CMAJ. 2015; 187: 666-669
        • GRADE Working Group
        Schünemann H. Brożek J. Guyatt G. Oxman A. GRADE handbook. 2013 (Available at:) (Accessed on June 8, 2017)
        • Argyle C.E.
        • Harper J.C.
        • Davies M.C.
        Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now?.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22: 440-449
        • Paynter S.J.
        • Cooper A.
        • Gregory L.
        • et al.
        Permeability characteristics of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant dimethylsulphoxide.
        Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 2338-2342
        • Pickering S.J.
        • Braude P.R.
        • Johnson M.H.
        • et al.
        Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte.
        Fertil Steril. 1990; 54: 102-108
        • Vincent C.
        • Johnson M.H.
        Cooling, cryoprotectants, and the cytoskeleton of the mammalian oocyte.
        Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1992; 14: 73-100
        • Matson P.L.
        • Graefling J.
        • Junk S.M.
        • et al.
        Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos: use of a mouse model to investigate effects upon zona hardness and formulate treatment strategies in an in-vitro fertilization programme.
        Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 1550-1553
        • Johnson M.H.
        • Pickering S.J.
        • George M.A.
        The influence of cooling on the properties of the zona pellucida of the mouse oocyte.
        Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 383-387
        • Antinori M.
        • Licata E.
        • Dani G.
        • et al.
        Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 14: 72-79
        • Ciotti P.M.
        • Porcu E.
        • Notarangelo L.
        • et al.
        Meiotic spindle recovery is faster in vitrification of human oocytes compared to slow freezing.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 2399-2407
        • Oktay K.
        • Cil A.P.
        • Bang H.
        Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 70-80
        • Cao Y.X.
        • Xing Q.
        • Li L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1306-1311
        • Fadini R.
        • Brambillasca F.
        • Renzini M.M.
        • et al.
        Human oocyte cryopreservation: comparison between slow and ultrarapid methods.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 19: 171-180
        • Smith G.D.
        • Serafini P.C.
        • Fioravanti J.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2088-2095
        • Cobo A.
        • Diaz C.
        Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 277-285
        • Kazem R.
        • Thompson L.A.
        • Srikantharajah A.
        • et al.
        Cryopreservation of human oocytes and fertilization by two techniques: in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
        Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 2650-2654
        • Porcu E.
        • Fabbri R.
        • Seracchioli R.
        • et al.
        Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes.
        Fertil Steril. 1997; 68: 724-726
        • Fabbri R.
        • Porcu E.
        • Marsella T.
        • et al.
        Oocyte cryopreservation.
        Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 98-108
        • Cobo A.
        • Garcia-Velasco J.A.
        • Coello A.
        • et al.
        Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 105 (e8): 755-764
        • Cobo A.
        • Kuwayama M.
        • Perez S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 89: 1657-1664
        • Cobo A.
        • Meseguer M.
        • Remohi J.
        • et al.
        Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 2239-2246
        • Sole M.
        • Santalo J.
        • Boada M.
        • et al.
        How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 2087-2092
        • Rienzi L.
        • Romano S.
        • Albricci L.
        • et al.
        Embryo development of fresh “versus” vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.
        Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 66-73
        • Parmegiani L.
        • Cognigni G.E.
        • Bernardi S.
        • et al.
        Efficiency of aseptic open vitrification and hermetical cryostorage of human oocytes.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23: 505-512
        • Chang C.C.
        • Elliott T.A.
        • Wright G.
        • et al.
        Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 1891-1897
        • Potdar N.
        • Gelbaya T.A.
        • Nardo L.G.
        Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29: 159-176
        • Cobo A.
        • Garrido N.
        • Pellicer A.
        • et al.
        Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 104 (e1–8): 1426-1434
        • Doyle J.O.
        • Richter K.S.
        • Lim J.
        • et al.
        Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 105 (e2): 459-466
        • Liebermann J.
        Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 4: 4328
        • Loutradi K.E.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • Venetis C.A.
        • et al.
        Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 186-193
        • Balaban B.
        • Urman B.
        • Ata B.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
        Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1976-1982
        • Cil A.P.
        • Bang H.
        • Oktay K.
        Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 (e3): 492-499
        • Devine K.
        • Mumford S.L.
        • Goldman K.N.
        • et al.
        Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103 (e1–2): 1446-1453
        • van Loendersloot L.L.
        • Moolenaar L.M.
        • Mol B.W.
        • et al.
        Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing.
        Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 3054-3060
        • Hirshfeld-Cytron J.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Milad M.P.
        Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 665-670
        • Mesen T.B.
        • Mersereau J.E.
        • Kane J.B.
        • et al.
        Optimal timing for elective egg freezing.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103 (e1–4): 1551-1556
        • Committee on Gynecologic Practice
        Committee opinion no. 618: ovarian reserve testing.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 268-273
        • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103: e9-17
        • Melo M.A.
        • Garrido N.
        • Alvarez C.
        • et al.
        Antral follicle count (AFC) can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation program.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 148-156
        • McIlveen M.
        • Skull J.D.
        • Ledger W.L.
        Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population.
        Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 778-785
        • Younis J.S.
        • Ben-Ami M.
        • Ben-Shlomo I.
        The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: a contemporary critical appraisal.
        J Ovarian Res. 2015; 8: 76
        • Ripley M.
        • Lanes A.
        • Leveille M.C.
        • et al.
        Does ovarian reserve predict egg quality in unstimulated therapeutic donor insemination cycles?.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103 (e2): 1170-1175
        • Tremellen K.
        • Kolo M.
        Serum anti-Mullerian hormone is a useful measure of quantitative ovarian reserve but does not predict the chances of live-birth pregnancy.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50: 568-572
        • Kwee J.
        • Schats R.
        • McDonnell J.
        • et al.
        Intercycle variability of ovarian reserve tests: results of a prospective randomized study.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 590-595
        • Roberts J.E.
        • Spandorfer S.
        • Fasouliotis S.J.
        • et al.
        Taking a basal follicle-stimulating hormone history is essential before initiating in vitro fertilization.
        Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 37-41
        • Polyzos N.P.
        • Tournaye H.
        • Guzman L.
        • et al.
        Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 430-437
        • Fleming R.
        • Seifer D.B.
        • Frattarelli J.L.
        • et al.
        Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Mullerian hormone.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 31: 486-496
        • Broer S.L.
        • van Disseldorp J.
        • Broeze K.A.
        • et al.
        Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19: 26-36
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Campbell B.
        • Hopkisson J.
        • et al.
        A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 855-864
        • Bozdag G.
        • Calis P.
        • Zengin D.
        • et al.
        Age related normogram for antral follicle count in general population and comparison with previous studies.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 206: 120-124
        • La Marca A.
        • Spada E.
        • Sighinolfi G.
        • et al.
        Age-specific nomogram for the decline in antral follicle count throughout the reproductive period.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 684-688
        • Gibreel A.
        • Maheshwari A.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound tests of ovarian reserve; a systematic review of accuracy in predicting fertility outcomes.
        Hum Fertil. 2009; 12: 95-106
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Chan Y.
        • Islam R.
        • et al.
        Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 657-663
        • Rombauts L.
        • Onwude J.L.
        • Chew H.W.
        • et al.
        The predictive value of antral follicle count remains unchanged across the menstrual cycle.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 1514-1518
        • Mavrelos D.
        • Al Chami A.
        • Talaulikar V.
        • et al.
        Variation in antral follicle counts at different times in the menstrual cycle: does it matter?.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 33: 174-179
        • Ferraretti A.P.
        • La Marca A.
        • Fauser B.C.
        • et al.
        ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.
        Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 1616-1624
        • Broer S.L.
        • Dolleman M.
        • van Disseldorp J.
        • et al.
        Prediction of an excessive response in in vitro fertilization from patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests and comparison in subgroups: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 (e7): 420-429
        • Silva J.B.
        • Panaino T.R.
        • Tamm M.A.
        • et al.
        Prediction of metaphase II oocytes according to different serum Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in antagonist ICSI cycles.
        JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016; 20: 222-226
        • Iliodromiti S.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Nelson S.M.
        Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21: 698-710
        • Ganidou M.A.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • Venetis C.A.
        • et al.
        Is assessment of anti-Mullerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study.
        Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014; 30: 817-821
        • Arce J.C.
        • La Marca A.
        • Mirner Klein B.
        • et al.
        Antimullerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 1644-1653
        • Kunt C.
        • Ozaksit G.
        • Keskin Kurt R.
        • et al.
        Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better marker than inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol or antral follicle count in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 283: 1415-1421
        • Nardo L.G.
        • Gelbaya T.A.
        • Wilkinson H.
        • et al.
        Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1586-1593
        • La Marca A.
        • Spada E.
        • Grisendi V.
        • et al.
        Normal serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the general female population and the relationship with reproductive history.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 163: 180-184
        • La Marca A.
        • Sighinolfi G.
        • Radi D.
        • et al.
        Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART).
        Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16: 113-130
        • Heidar Z.
        • Bakhtiyari M.
        • Mirzamoradi M.
        • et al.
        Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Mullerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF.
        J Endocrinol Invest. 2015; 38: 1007-1015
        • Kissell K.A.
        • Danaher M.R.
        • Schisterman E.F.
        • et al.
        Biological variability in serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the menstrual cycle in ovulatory and sporadic anovulatory cycles in eumenorrheic women.
        Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1764-1772
        • Rezende C.P.
        • Rocha A.L.
        • Dela Cruz C.
        • et al.
        Serum antimullerian hormone measurements with second generation assay at two distinct menstrual cycle phases for prediction of cycle cancellation, pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014; 31: 1303-1310
        • Rustamov O.
        • Smith A.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • et al.
        The measurement of anti-Mullerian hormone: a critical appraisal.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99: 723-732
        • D'Arpe S.
        • Di Feliciantonio M.
        • Candelieri M.
        • et al.
        Ovarian function during hormonal contraception assessed by endocrine and sonographic markers: a systematic review.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 33: 436-448
        • Birch Petersen K.
        • Hvidman H.W.
        • Forman J.L.
        • et al.
        Ovarian reserve assessment in users of oral contraception seeking fertility advice on their reproductive lifespan.
        Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 2364-2375
        • Deb S.
        • Campbell B.K.
        • Pincott-Allen C.
        • et al.
        Quantifying effect of combined oral contraceptive pill on functional ovarian reserve as measured by serum anti-Mullerian hormone and small antral follicle count using three-dimensional ultrasound.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39: 574-580
        • Tsafrir A.
        • Haimov-Kochman R.
        • Margalioth E.J.
        • et al.
        Ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation for prevention of age-related fertility loss: one in five is a low responder.
        Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31: 779-782
        • Goldman R.H.
        • Racowsky C.
        • Farland L.V.
        • et al.
        Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
        Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 853-859
        • Humaidan P.
        • Quartarolo J.
        • Papanikolaou E.G.
        Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 389-400
        • Nayak S.R.
        • Wakim A.N.
        Random-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist-treated cycles with GnRH agonist trigger for fertility preservation.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: e51-e54
        • Oktay K.
        • Turkcuoglu I.
        • Rodriguez-Wallberg K.A.
        GnRH agonist trigger for women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation by aromatase inhibitor/FSH stimulation.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 20: 783-788
        • Gelbaya T.A.
        Short and long-term risks to women who conceive through in vitro fertilization.
        Hum Fertil. 2010; 13: 19-27
        • Maxwell K.N.
        • Cholst I.N.
        • Rosenwaks Z.
        The incidence of both serious and minor complications in young women undergoing oocyte donation.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 2165-2171
        • Bodri D.
        • Guillen J.J.
        • Polo A.
        • et al.
        Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 17: 237-243
        • Biro M.A.
        • Davey M.A.
        • Carolan M.
        • et al.
        Advanced maternal age and obstetric morbidity for women giving birth in Victoria, Australia: a population-based study.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52: 229-234
        • Lemoine M.E.
        • Ravitsky V.
        Sleepwalking into infertility: the need for a public health approach toward advanced maternal age.
        Am J Bioeth. 2015; 15: 37-48
        • Carolan M.C.
        • Davey M.A.
        • Biro M.
        • et al.
        Very advanced maternal age and morbidity in Victoria, Australia: a population based study.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 80
        • Ludford I.
        • Scheil W.
        • Tucker G.
        • Grivell R.
        Pregnancy outcomes for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age in South Australia, 1998–2008.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52: 235-241
        • Cleary-Goldman J.
        • Malone F.D.
        • Vidaver J.
        • et al.
        Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 983-990
        • Ziadeh S.
        • Yahaya A.
        Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001; 265: 30-33
        • Gilbert W.M.
        • Nesbitt T.S.
        • Danielsen B.
        Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 9-14
        • Jahromi B.N.
        • Husseini Z.
        Pregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and older.
        Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 47: 318-321
        • Noyes N.
        • Porcu E.
        • Borini A.
        Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18: 769-776
        • Robertson J.A.
        Egg freezing and egg banking: empowerment and alienation in assisted reproduction.
        J Law Biosci. 2014; 1: 113-136
        • Pennings G.
        What are the ownership rights for gametes and embryos? Advance directives and the disposition of cryopreserved gametes and embryos.
        Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 979-986
        • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (electronic address: [email protected])
        • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
        Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion.
        Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 52-58
        • Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Essential elements of informed consent for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a Practice Committee opinion.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: S134-S135
        • Stoop D.
        • Maes E.
        • Polyzos N.P.
        • et al.
        Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
        Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 338-344