No. 223-Content of a Complete Routine Second Trimester Obstetrical Ultrasound Examination and Report

  • Yvonne Cargill
    Corresponding Author: Dr. Yvonne Cargill, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
    Ottawa, ON
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lucie Morin
    Montréal, QC
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ∗ Diagnostic Imaging Committee: Lucie Morin (Chair), MD, Montréal, QC; Stephen Bly, PhD, Ottawa, ON; Kimberly Butt, MD, Fredericton, NB; Yvonne Cargill, MD, Ottawa, ON; Nanette Denis, RDMS, CRGS, Saskatoon, SK; Robert Gagnon, MD, Montréal, QC; Marja Anne Hietala-Coyle, RN, Halifax, NS; Kenneth Lim, MD, Vancouver, BC; Annie Ouellet, MD, Sherbrooke, QC; Marie-Hélène Racicot, MD, Montréal, QC; Shia Salem, MD, Canadian Association of Radiologists, Toronto, ON. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada acknowledges advisory input from the Canadian Association of Radiologists pertaining to imaging guidelines in the creation of this document. Disclosure statements have been received from all members of the committee.



      To review the benefits of and requirements for a complete second trimester ultrasound and the documentation needed.


      A complete second trimester ultrasound provides information about the number of fetuses, the gestational age, the location of the placenta, and fetal and maternal anatomy.


      In the production of this document, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine's “Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations,” the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletin, “Ultrasound in Pregnancy,” and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Working Party Report, “Ultrasound Screening” were reviewed. PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched using the words “routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound.”


      The evidence was evaluated using the guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

      Benefits, Harms, and Costs

      A routine complete second trimester ultrasound between 18 and 22 weeks and a complete ultrasound report will provide the best opportunity to diagnose fetal anomalies and to assist in the management of prenatal care. It will also reduce the number of ultrasound examinations done during the second trimester for completion of fetal anatomy survey. The costs are those involved with the performance of obstetrical ultrasound.


      This is a revision of previous guidelines; information from other consensus reviews from medical publications has been used.


      The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.


      • 1.
        Pregnant women should be offered a routine second trimester ultrasound between 18 and 22 weeks' gestation (II-2B).
      • 2.
        Second trimester ultrasound should screen for the number of fetuses, the gestational age, and the location of the placenta (II-1A).
      • 3.
        Second trimester ultrasound should screen for fetal anomalies (II-2B).

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ecker J.L.
        • Green M.F.
        Indications for diagnostic obstetrical ultrasound examination.
        (UpToDate [web site] Version 15.1)December 2006
        • Neilson J.P.
        Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (Review).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1998; (Art. No.: CD000182)
        • ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
        ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 58, October 2008. Ultrasonography in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 1449-1458
        • Seeds J.W.
        The routine screening obstetrical ultrasound examination.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 39: 814-830
        • Liu S.
        • Joseph K.S.
        • Wen S.W.
        Trends in fetal and infant deaths caused by congenital anomalies.
        Semin Perinatol. 2002; 26: 268-276
        • Souka A.P.
        • Pilalis A.
        • Kavalakis I.
        • et al.
        Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14- week ultrasound scan.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 393-396
        • Lantz M.E.
        • Chisolm C.A.
        The preferred timing of second-trimester sonography based on maternal body mass index.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23: 1019-1022
        • Whittle M.J.
        • Chitty L.S.
        • Neilson J.P.
        • et al.
        • National Working Party, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        Ultrasound Screening. Supplement to Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Abnormalities.
        (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Working Party Report)July 2000 (Available at:) (Accessed November 26, 2008)
      1. Tjepkema M. Adult obesity in Canada: measured height and weight. Statistics Canada, 82–620-MWE/2005001.

        • Ewigman B.G.
        • Crane J.P.
        • Frigoletto F.D.
        Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 821-827
        • Woolf S.H.
        • Battista R.N.
        • Angerson G.M.
        • et al.
        • Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
        New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
        CMAJ. 2003; 169: 207-208