Advertisement
JOGC
Research Article| Volume 19, ISSUE 13, P1385-1391, December 1997

Can Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring ultimately become a useful tool in Obstetrical Practice?

  • Robert Gagnon
    Affiliations
    Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Physiology, University of Western Ontario, MRC Group in Fetal and Neonatal Health and Development, Lawson Research Institute
    St. Joseph’s Health Centre London, Ontario
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Currently, fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is the most widely used method for antepartum and intrapartum fetal surveillance. Antenatally, the introduction of FHR monitoring has been associated with a parallel decrease in perinatal mortality. However, a number of small scale controlled studies has failed to demonstrate the usefulness of FHR monitoring, both antenatally and intrapartum. Several possible explanations could be responsible for this apparent incongruous observation. Although FHR is normally easy to record, the quality of tracing is often sub-optimal, and adds to the complete lack of uniform interpretation shown in studies comparing interobserver and intra-observer variations. In addition, there is now an abundance of human observations and animal studies demonstrating that gestational age, in addition to the development of fetal behavioural status, are the most important factors that will alter FHR patterns under normal conditions and in response to hypoxaemia. It is also becoming evident that growth-restricted fetuses have inherent differences in FHR patterns when compared to normally-grown fetuses, possibly due to a delay in the maturation of the autonomic control of the fetal heart in response to chronic hypoxaemia. Therefore, in order to use electronic FHR monitoring, it is becoming necessary for the clinician to start learning about the physiology of the fetus, its changing evolution with advancing gestation, and the various ways these are represented in FHR tracings under stress or distress. With the development of computerized FHR analysis that virtually eliminates interobserver and intra-observer variation in interpretation, in addition to the knowkdge of the factors influencing FHR, it is now possible and timely to conduct a properly designed, large scale, randomized clinical trial to demonstrate whether or not both antenatal and intrapartum FHR monitoring can ultimately become useful tools in obstetrical practice.

      Resume

      La surveillance de la fréquence cardiaque du foetus (FCF) est actuellement la méthode de surveillance antepartum et intrapartum la plus fréquemment utilisée. Avant la naissance, on a lié l’adoption de la surveillance de la FCF à une diminution parallèle de la mortalité périnatale. Cependant, un certain nombre d’études contrôleés à petite échelle n’ont pas permis d’établir d’utilité de la surveillance de la FCF, à la fois avant la naissance et pendant l’intrapartum. On pourrait donner plusieurs explications de cette observation apparemment incongrue. Bien qu’il soit normalement facile d’enregistrer la FCF, la qualité du tracé est rarement optimale et elle favorise la totole absence d’uniformite d’interprétation constatée dans les études comparatives des écarts entre les observateurs et chez un même observateur. De plus, on dispose maintenant de nombreuses observations humaines et d’études animales révélant que l’âge gestationnel, ainsi que le développement des états comportementaux du foetus, constituent les plus importants facteurs d’altération des tracés de la FCF, dans des conditions normales et en réaction à l’hypoxémie. Il devient aussi évident que les foetus manifestant un retard de croissance présentent des différences inhérentes quant aux tracés de la FCF par comparaison avec les foetus dont la croissance est normale, peut-être en raison d’un retard de maturation du contrôle autonome du coeur foetal en réaction à une hypoxémie chronique. Ainsi, pour recourir à la surveillance électronique de la FCF, le clinicien doit se familiariser avec la physiologje du foetus, son évolution pendant le déroulement de la gestation et les divers moyens servant à représenter ces éléments dans les tracés de la FCF en cas de stress ou de souffrance. Grâce au perfectionnement de l’analyse informatisée de la FCF, qui élimine pratiquement les écarts d’interprétation entre les observateurs et chez le même observateur, en plus de la connaissance des facteurs ayant une incidence sur la FCF, il est maintenant possible d’effectuer rapidement un essai clinique randomisé, à grande échelle et bien conçu, pour vérifier si la surveillance de la FCF, à la fois avant la naissance et pendant l’intrapartum, pourra éventuellement devenir un outil utile pour exercer l’obstétrique.

      Key Words

      References

        • Thaker SB.
        The efficacy of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156: 24-30
        • Prechtl HFR
        • Akiyama Y
        • Zinkin P
        • et al.
        Polygraphic studies of the full-term newborn. I. Technical aspects and qualitative analysis, London, Heinemann. In: Ban MCO, MacKeith RC (Eds). Studies in Infancy (ed. 6).
        Clin Dev Med. 1968; 27: 10-21
        • Nijhuis JG
        • Prechtl HFR
        • Martin Jr., CB
        • et al.
        Are there behavioural states in the human fetus?.
        Early Hum Dev. 1982; 6: 177-195
        • Gagnon R
        • Hunse C
        • Fellows F
        • et al.
        Fetal heart rate and activity patterns in growth-retarded fetuses: changes after vibratory acoustic stimulation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158: 265-271
        • Smith CV
        • Nguyen ITN
        • Phelan JP
        • et al.
        Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of fetal acoustic stimulation with acid-base determinations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155: 726-728
        • Low JA
        • McGrath MJ
        • Marshall SJ
        • et al.
        The relationship between antepartum fetal heart rate, intrapartum fetal heart rate, and fetal acid-base status.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 154: 769-776
        • Borgatta L
        • Shrout PE
        • Divon MY.
        Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 554-558
        • Lotgering FK
        • Wallenburg HSC
        • Schouten HJA.
        Interob-server and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144: 701-705
        • Hage ML.
        Interpretation of nonstress tests.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 153: 490-495
        • Gagnon R
        • Campbell K
        • Hunse C.
        A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168: 842-847
        • Gagnon R
        • Bocking AD
        • Richardson BS
        • McLean P.
        A fiat decelerative fetal heart rate tracing with normál fetal heart rate variability.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 1379-1381
        • Patrick J
        • Campbell K
        • Carmichael L
        • Natale R
        • Richardson B.
        Patterns of human fetal breathing during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 56: 24-30
        • Richardson B
        • Natale R
        • Patrick J.
        Human fetal breathing during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 133: 247
        • Patrick J
        • Campbell K
        • Carmichael L
        • Natale R
        • Richardson B.
        Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142: 363-371
        • Natale R
        • Nasello C
        • Turliuk R.
        The relationship between movements and accelerations in fetal heart rate at 24 to 32 weeks’ gestation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 148: 591-595
        • Bocking AD
        • Harding R
        • Wickham PJD.
        Relationships between accelerations and decelerations in heart rate and skeletal muscle activity in fetal sheep.
        J Dev Physiol. 1985; 7: 47-54
        • Spencer JAD
        • Johnson P.
        Fetal heart rate variability changes and fetal behavioural cycles during labour.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 93: 314-321
        • Dawes GS
        • Rosevear SK
        • Pello LC
        • et al.
        Computerized analysis of episodic changes in fetal heart rate variation in early labor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165: 618-624
        • Murata Y
        • Martin CV
        • lkenoue T
        • et al.
        Fetal heart rate accelerations and late decelerations during the course of intrauterine death in chronically catheterized rhesus monkeys.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144: 218-222
        • Low JA
        • Cox MJ
        • Karchmar EJ
        • et al.
        The prediction of intrapartum fetal metabolic acidosis by fetal heart rate monitoring.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139: 299
        • MacDonald D
        • Grant A
        • Sheridan-Pereira M
        • et al.
        The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 524-539
        • Pello LC
        • Rosevear SR
        • Dawes GS
        • et al.
        Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 602-610
        • Gagnon R.
        Stimulation of human fetuses with sound and vibration.
        Semin Perinatol. 1989; 13: 393-402
        • Murotsuki J
        • Bocking AD
        • Gagnon R.
        Fetal heart rate patterns in growth-restricted fetal sheep induced by chronic fetal placental embolization.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176: 282-290