Advertisement
JOGC
Research Article| Volume 20, ISSUE 8, P769-773, July 1998

The Intra-Uterine Device

        This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

        References

          • Wilson JC
          A New Zealand randomized comparative study of three lUDs (Nova T®, MLCu375, MLAgCu250): 1–, 2– and 3–year results.
          Adv Contracept. 1992; 8: 153-159
          • World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction
          A randomized multicentre trial of the Multiload 375 and TCu380A lUDs in parous women: three-year results.
          Contraception. 1994; 49: 543-549
          • Luukkainen T
          • Allonen H
          • Kaukkamaa M
          • et al.
          Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12–month report of a European multicenter study.
          Contraception. 1987; 36: 161-179
          • Cole LP
          • Potts DM
          • Aranda C
          • Behliliovic B
          • Etman S
          • Moreno J
          Randic L An evaluation of the T Cu380 Ag and the Multiload Cu375.
          Fertil Steril. 1985; 43: 214-217
          • Indian Council of Medical Research
          Task Force on IUD. Randomized clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380 Ag, CuT 220C and CuT 220B).
          Contraception. 1989; 39: 37-52
          • Luukkainen T
          • Allonen H
          • Nielsen N-C
          • Nygren K-G
          • Pyorala T
          Five years’ experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T® and the Copper-T 200.
          Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 147: 885-892
          • Sastrawinata S
          • Farr G
          • Prihadi SM
          • Hutapea H
          • Anwar M
          • Wahyudi I
          • Sunjoto Kemara KP
          • Champion CB
          • Robbins M
          A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380 Ag, Lippes Loop D, and Multiload Cu 375 lUDs in Indonesia.
          Contraception. 1991; 44: 141-154
          • Sivin I
          • Stern J
          Long-acting, more effective Copper T lUDs: a summary of US experience, 1970–75.
          Stud Fam Plann. 1979; 10: 263-281
          • Sivin I
          • Stern J
          • Diaz J
          Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380 Ag and levonorgestrel 20μg/day devices.
          Contraception. 1987; 35: 245-255
          • World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction
          The TCu 380 A IUD and the frameless IUD “the Flexigard:” interim three-year data from an international multicentre trial.
          Contraception. 1995; 52: 77-83
          • World Health Organization (WHO)
          Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. WHO, Geneva1987 (Technical Report Series 753)
          • Rybo G
          • Andersson K
          IUD use and endometrial bleedings.
          in: Bardin CW Mishell Jr, DR Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on lUDs. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass1994: 210-218
          • Milšom I
          • Andersson K
          • Jonasson K
          • Linsted G
          • Rybo G
          The influence of the Gyne-T 380S® IUD on menstrual blood loss and iron status.
          Contraception. 1995; 52: 175-179
          • Burkman RT
          • the Women’s Health Study
          Association between intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease.
          Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 57: 269-276
          • Lee NC
          • Rubin GL
          • Ory HW
          • Burkman RT
          Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
          Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 62: 1-6
          • Kronmal RA
          • Whitney CW
          • Mumford SD
          The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: the Women’s Health Study reanalyzed.
          J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 109-122
          • Chi l-C
          What we have learned from recent IUD studies: a researcher’s perspective.
          Contraception. 1993; 48: 81-108
          • Farley TMM
          • Rosenberg MJ
          • Rowe P
          • Chen J-H
          • Meirik O
          Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.
          Lancet. 1992; 339: 785-788
          • Guillebaud J
          Contraception. Churchill Livingstone, London1993: 323-324 (Second Edition)
          • Population Information Program. Population Reports
          The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore. 1995: 22 (Volume XXII, Series B, Number 6)
          • UK Family Planning Research Network
          Pregnancy outcome associated with the use of lUDs.
          Br J Fam Plann. 1989; 15: 7-10
          • Alvior Jr, GT
          Pregnancy outcome with removal of intrauterine device.
          Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 41: 894-896
          • Tatum HJ
          • Schmidt FH
          • Jain AK
          Management and outcome of pregnancies associated with the Copper T intrauterine devices.
          Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 126: 869-879
          • Sivin I
          • El Mahgoub S
          • McCarthy T
          • Mishell DR
          • Shoupe D
          • Alvarez F
          • Brache V
          • Jimenez E
          • Diaz J
          • Faundes A
          • Diaz MM
          • Coutinho E
          • Mattos CER
          • Diaz SL
          • Pavez M
          • Stern J
          Long-term contraception with the Levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (Lng 20) and the Copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study.
          Contraception. 1990; 42: 361-378
          • Population Information Program. Population Reports
          The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore. 1995: 10 (Volume XXII, Series B, Number 6)
          • Guillebaud J
          Reduction by mefenamic acid of increased menstrual blood loss associated with intrauterine contraception.
          Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978; 85: 53-62