Advertisement
JOGC
Research Article| Volume 20, ISSUE 8, P754-761, July 1998

Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The first spinal anaesthetic for obstetrics was administered in 1900. Epidural anaesthesia, as a single injection technique, was introduced around the same time, and by the 1950s had become the more popular technique. The use of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section has increased since the late 1980s due to the introduction of the pencil-point spinal needles which are associated with a low incidence of headache. Spinal anaesthesia has a number of advantages. It is a reliable, easily learned technique which requires a low dose of local anaesthetic and, hence, has a low risk of toxicity. The quality of the block is better and the onset is more rapid than with epidural anaesthesia. Unlike the epidural, spinal anaesthesia largely remains a single injection technique which has some disadvantages. The side-effect profile of spinal anaesthesia is similar to that seen with epidural anaesthesia.
      In summary, spinal anaesthesia produces rapid, effective, reliable and safe anaesthesia f or Caesarean section while using low doses of local anaesthetic. This makes it the preferable technique for elective procedures.

      Résumé

      En obstétrique, on a administré le premier anesthésique rachidien en 1900. La technique d’anesthésie péridurale par injection unique a été adoptée vers la même époque et, dans les années 1950, elle est devenue la technique la plus populaire. Le recours à l’anesthésie rachidienne en cas de césarienne a augmenté depuis la fin des années 1980, en raison de l’adoption d’aiguilles pour ponction lombaire à pointe conique qui sont liées à une faible incidence de céphalée.
      L’anesthésie rachidienne présente un certain nombre d’avantages. C’est une technique fiable, facile à apprendre, nécessitant une faible dose d’anesthésique local et se traduisant donc par un faible risque de toxicité. L’anesthésie est de meilleure qualité et débute plus rapidement que l’anesthésie péridurale. Au contraire de la péridurale, l’anesthésie rachidienne demeure principalement une technique à injection unique qui comporte certains inconvénients. Le profil d’effets secondaires de l’anesthésie rachidienne est semblable à celui que l’on observe par suite de l’anesthésie péridurale.
      En résumé, l’anesthésie rachidiénne produit une anesthésie rapide, efficace, fiable et sûre en vue d’une césarienne, tout en nécessitant de faibles doses d’anesthésique local. Cette technique est donc préférable pour les interventions non urgentes.

      Key Words

      References

        • Marx GF
        The long road to the introduction of spinal blockade in obstetrics.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 1991; 1: 47-49
        • Cleland JGP
        • Hingson RA
        History of pain relief during childbirth.
        in: Lull CB Hingson RA Control of Pain in Childbirth. 3. Lippincott, Philadelphia1948: 139-152
        • Cosgrove SA
        • Hall PO
        • Gleeson WJ
        Spinal anesthesia with particular reference to its use in obstetrics.
        Anesth Analg. 1937; 16: 234-237
        • Ullery JC
        Continuous spinal analgesia in cesarean section. Its advantages, technique, and an analysis of three hundred cases.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946; 52: 100-105
        • Tuohy EB
        Continuous spinal anesthesia: its usefulness and technique involved.
        Anesthesiology. 1944; 5: 142-148
        • Bromage PR
        Epidural Analgesia. WB Saunders, London1978: 1
        • Cope RW
        The Woolley and Roe case. Woolley and Roe versus Ministry of Health and others.
        Anaesthesia. 1954; 9: 249-270
        • Kotelko DM
        • Dailey PA
        • Shnider SM
        • Rosen MA
        • Hughes SC
        • Brizgy RV
        Epidural morphine analgesia after cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 63: 409-413
        • Sprotte G
        • Schedel R
        • Pajunk H
        • Pajunk H
        Eine “atraumatische” universalkanüle für einzeitige regionalanaesthesien.
        Reg Anaesth. 1987; 10: 104-108
        • Kuhnert BR
        • Zuspan KJ
        • Kuhnert PM
        • Syracuse CD
        • Brown DE
        Bupivacaine disposition in mother, fetus, and neonate after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1987; 66: 407-412
        • Albright GA
        Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine.
        (Editorial) Anesthesiology. 1979; 51: 285-287
        • Kestin IG
        Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics.
        Br J Anaesth. 1991; 66: 596-607
        • Glosten B
        • Gianas A
        • Chadwick HS
        • Coda B
        • Ross BK
        Practical aspects of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery: failure rates and anesthetic preparation times—an observational study.
        (Abstract) Anesthesiology. 1995; 83: A977
        • Riley ET
        • Cohen SE
        • Macario A
        • Desai JB
        • Ratner EF
        Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications.
        Anesth Analg. 1995; 80: 709-712
        • Marx GF
        • Luykx WM
        • Cohen S
        Fetal-neonatal status following Caesarean section for fetal distress.
        Br J Anaesth. 1984; 56: 1009-1012
        • Rigler ML
        • Drasner K
        • Krejcie TC
        • et al.
        Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia.
        Anesth Analg. 1991; 72: 275-281
        • Schell RM
        • Brauer FS
        • Cole DJ
        Applegate II RL Persistent sacral nerve root deficits after continuous spinal anaesthesia.
        Can J Anaesth. 1991; 38: 908-911
        • Norris MC
        Leighton BL Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional dural puncture in parturients.
        Reg Anesth. 1990; 15: 285-287
        • El Abouleish
        Epinephrine improves the quality of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1987; 66: 395-400
        • Santos A
        • Pedersen H
        • Finster M
        • Edström H
        Hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1984; 63: 1009-1013
        • Russell IF
        Effect of posture during the induction of subarachnoid analgesia for Caesarean section. Right vs left lateral.
        Br J Anaesth. 1987; 59: 342-346
        • Beizarena SD
        Clinical effects of intrathecally administered fentanyl in patients undergoing cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1992; 74: 653-657
        • Abouleish E
        • Rawal N
        • Fallon K
        • Hernandez D
        Combined intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine for cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1988; 67: 370-374
        • McCrae AF
        • Wildsmith JAW
        Prevention and treatment of hypotension during central neural block.
        Br J Anaesth. 1993; 70: 672-680
        • Ramanathan S
        • Grant GJ
        Vasopressor therapy for hypotension due to epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988; 32: 559-565
        • Thomas DG
        • Robson SC
        • Redfern N
        • Hughes D
        • Boys RJ
        Randomized trial of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for maintenance of arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
        Br J Anaesth. 1996; 76: 61-65
        • Marx GF
        • Domurat MF
        • Costin M
        Potential hazards of hypoglycaemia in the parturient.
        Can J Anaesth. 1987; 34: 400-402
        • Wallace DH
        • Leveno KJ
        • Cunningham FG
        • Giesecke AH
        • Shearer VE
        • Sidawi JE
        Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 86: 193-199
        • Hood DD
        • Boese PA
        Epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section in severely pre-eclamptic parturients.
        (Abstract) Reg Anesth. 1992; 17: 35
        • Shearer VE
        • Jhaveri HS
        • Cunningham FG
        Puerperal seizures after post-dural puncture headache.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 255-260
        • Dunbar SA
        • Katz NP
        Failure of delayed epidural blood patching to correct persistent cranial nerve palsies.
        Anesth Analg. 1994; 79: 806-807
        • Pavlin DJ
        • McDonald JS
        • Child B
        • Rusch V
        Acute subdural hematoma—an unusual sequela to lumbar puncture.
        Anesthesiology. 1979; 51: 338-340
        • Chadwick HS
        • Posner K
        • Caplan RA
        • Ward RJ
        • Cheney FW
        A comparison of obstetric and nonobstetric anesthesia malpractice claims.
        Anesthesiology. 1991; 74: 242-249
        • Lybecker H
        • Moller JT
        • May O
        • Nielsen HK
        Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias.
        Anesth Analg. 1990; 70: 389-394
        • Stride PC
        • Cooper GM
        Dural taps revisited. A 20–year survey from Birmingham Maternity Hospital.
        Anaesthesia. 1993; 48: 247-255
        • Halpern S
        • Preston R
        Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design.
        Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81: 1376-1383
        • Ross BK
        • Chadwick HS
        • Mancuso JJ
        • Benedetti C
        Sprotte needle for obstetric anesthesia: decreased incidence of post dural puncture headache.
        Reg Anesth. 1992; 17: 29-33
        • Campbell DC
        • Douglas MJ
        • Pavy TJG
        • Merrick P
        • Flanagan ML
        • McMorland GH
        Comparison of the 25–gauge Whitacre with the 24–gauge Sprotte spinal needle for elective Caesarean section: cost implications.
        Can J Anaesth. 1993; 40: 1131-1135
        • Douglas MJ
        • Ward ME
        • Campbell DC
        • Bright SE
        • Merrick P
        Factors involved in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache with the 25 gauge Whitacre needle for obstetric anesthesia.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997; 6: 220-223
        • Lambert DH
        • Hurley RJ
        • Hertwig L
        • Datta S
        Role of needle gauge and tip configuration in the production of lumbar puncture headache.
        Reg Anesth. 1997; 22: 66-72
        • Weeks SK
        Spinal headache—prevention and treatment.
        Can J Anaesth. 1990; 37: Sliii-Slviii
        • Carp H
        • Singh PJ
        • Vadhera R
        • Jayaram A
        Effects of the serotonin-receptor agonist sumatriptan on postdural puncture headache: report of six cases.
        Anesth Analg. 1994; 79: 180-182
        • Thomberry EA
        • Thomas TA
        Posture and post-spinal headache. A controlled trial in 80 obstetric patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 1988; 60: 195-197
        • Cook PT
        • Davies MJ
        • Beavis RE
        Bed rest and postlumbar puncture headache. The effectiveness of 24 hours’ recumbency in reducing the incidence of postlumbar puncture headache.
        Anaesthesia. 1989; 44: 389-391
        • Camann WR
        • Murray RS
        • Mushlin PS
        • Lambert DH
        Effects of oral caffeine on postdural puncture headache. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
        Anesth Analg. 1990; 70: 181-184
        • Ostheimer GW
        • Palahniuk RJ
        • Shnider SM
        Epidural blood patch for post-lumbar- puncture headache.
        (Letter) Anesthesiology. 1974; 41: 307-308
        • Morley AP
        • Messer CP
        Failure of repeated blood patch in a parturient with spinal headache.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 1993; 2: 204-206
        • Taivainen T
        • Pitkänen M
        • Tuominen M
        • Rosenberg PH
        Efficacy of epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993; 37: 702-705
        • Kane RE
        Neurologic deficits following epidural or spinal anesthesia.
        Anesth Analg. 1981; 60: 150-161
        • Scott DB
        • Hibbard BM
        Serious non-fatal complications associated with extradural block in obstetric practice.
        Br J Anaesth. 1990; 64: 537-541
        • Scott DB
        • Tunstall ME
        Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 1995; 4: 133-139
        • Holdcroft A
        • Gibberd FB
        • Hargrove RL
        • Hawkins DF
        • Dellaportas CI
        Neurological complications associated with pregnancy.
        Br J Anaesth. 1995; 75: 522-526
        • Pollock JE
        • Neal JM
        • Stephenson CA
        • Wiley CE
        Prospective study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.
        Anesthesiology. 1996; 84: 1361-1367
        • Douglas MJ
        Neurotoxicity of lidocaine—does it exist? (Editorial).
        Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42: 181-185
        • Iyer NR
        • Newman LM
        • Tuman KJ
        Transient radicular irritation after hyperbaric lidocaine spinal anesthesia in parturients.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997; 6: 132-134
        • Caplan RA
        • Ward RJ
        • Posner K
        • Cheney FW
        Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors.
        Anesthesiology. 1988; 68: 5-11
        • Matta BF
        • Magee P
        Wenckebach type heart block following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
        Can J Anaesth. 1992; 39: 1067-1068
        • Stone PA
        • Thorbum J
        • Lamb KSR
        Complications of spinal anaesthesia following extradural block for Caesarean section.
        Br J Anaesth. 1989; 62: 335-337
        • Furst SR
        • Reisner LS
        Risk of high spinal anesthesia following failed epidural block for cesarean delivery.
        J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7: 71-74
        • MacArthur C
        • Lewis M
        • Knox EG
        • Crawford JS
        Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth.
        BMJ. 1990; 301: 9-12
        • Russell R
        • Dundas R
        • Reynolds F
        Long term backache after childbirth: prospective search for causative factors.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 1384-1388
        • Breen TW
        • Ransil BJ
        • Groves PA
        • Oriol NE
        Factors associated with back pain after childbirth.
        Anesthesiology. 1994; 81: 29-34
        • Lee JJ
        • Parry H
        Bacterial meningitis following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
        Br J Anaesth. 1991; 66: 383-386
        • Borum SE
        • McLeskey CH
        • Williamson JB
        • Harris FS
        • Knight AB
        Epidural abscess after obstetric epidural analgesia.
        Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 1523-1526
        • Eng RHK
        • Seligman SJ
        Lumbar puncture-induced meningitis.
        JAMA. 1981; 245: 1456-1459
        • Cascio M
        • Heath G
        Meningitis following a combined spinal-epidural technique in a labouring term parturient.
        Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43: 399-402
        • Harding SA
        • Collis RE
        • Morgan BM
        Meningitis after combined spinal-extradural anaesthesia in obstetrics.
        Br J Anaesth. 1994; 73: 545-547
        • Chestnut DH
        Spinal anesthesia in the febrile patient (Editorial).
        Anesthesiology. 1992; 76: 667-669
        • Bader AM
        • Gilbertson L
        • Kirz L
        • Datta S
        Regional anesthesia in women with chorioamnionitis.
        Reg Anesth. 1992; 17: 84-86
        • Goodman EJ
        • DeHorta E
        • Taguiam JM
        Safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in parturients with chorioamnionitis.
        Reg Anesth. 1996; 21: 436-441
        • Bidzinski J
        Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma during pregnancy. Case Report.
        J Neurosurg. 1966; 24: 1017
        • Yonekawa Y
        • Mehdorn HM
        • Nishikawa M
        Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma during pregnancy.
        Surg Neurol. 1975; 3: 327-328
        • Jouppila P
        • Jouppila R
        • Barinoff T
        • Koivula A
        Placental blood flow during Caesarean section performed under subarachnoid blockade.
        Br J Anaesth. 1984; 56: 1379-1382
        • Lindblad A
        • Bernow J
        • Maršál K
        Fetal blood flow during intrathecal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.
        Br J Anaesth. 1988; 61: 376-381
        • Norris MC
        Hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: does it affect neonatal outcome?.
        Reg Anesth. 1987; 12: 191-194
        • Armand S
        • Jasson J
        • Talafre M
        • Amiel-Tison C
        The effects of regional analgesia on the newborn.
        in: Reynolds F Effects on Baby of Maternal Analgesia and Anaesthesia. WB Saunders Co, London1993: 191-220